EN16931 / XRechnung / Peppol BIS 3 Validator

BR-48: Each VAT breakdown (BG-23) shall have a VAT category rate (BT-119), except…

fatal CII UBL

What this error means and how to fix it

An EN 16931 core rule: a mandatory business term is missing, or a basic condition between business terms is not met. Add or correct the element named in the rule text at the location the validation result shows. This is an error: the invoice is rejected until it is fixed.

Check your invoice against BR-48 — free

Runs the KoSIT validator 1.6.3, unmodified · result in seconds · the file is not stored

This error needs information only you have, so it is not repaired automatically. The free check shows every finding in the file with its location; if other errors in the same file are in the automatic set (totals, VAT breakdown, rounding, element order), the result page offers the corrected file for 9 €.

Rule text

[BR-48]-Each VAT breakdown (BG-23) shall have a VAT category rate (BT-119), except if the Invoice is not subject to VAT.
Where the rule is checked (XPath context and test)
SyntaxSeverityContext (XPath)Test (XPath)
EN16931-UBLfatalcac:TaxTotal/cac:TaxSubtotalexists(cac:TaxCategory[cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']/cbc:Percent) or (cac:TaxCategory[cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']/normalize-space(cbc:ID)='O')
EN16931-CIIfatal//ram:ApplicableHeaderTradeSettlement/ram:ApplicableTradeTax(.[upper-case(ram:TypeCode) = 'VAT']/ram:RateApplicablePercent) or (.[upper-case(ram:TypeCode) = 'VAT']/ram:CategoryCode = 'O')

Business terms referenced

BG-23, BT-119

Related rules

BR-AE-01, BR-CO-18, BR-E-01, BR-G-01, BR-IC-01, BR-IC-11, BR-IC-12, BR-IG-01, BR-IP-01, BR-O-01, BR-O-11, BR-O-12

Source: EN 16931-1 Schematron, UN/CEFACT CII syntax binding (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, EUPL-1.2).

Source: EN 16931-1 Schematron, UBL syntax binding (ConnectingEurope/eInvoicing-EN16931, EUPL-1.2).

Check your invoice against this rule